Has Prince Philip orchestrated the death of Diana, Princess of Wales? This is why that rumor never seems to go away.
The death of Diana, princess of Wales on August 31, 1997, left the world at the age of 36. Because Diana was so loved by so many people and was such a sympathetic woman – a beautiful real princess who really seemed to care about humanity, a young mother whose hope for a happy marriage was inspired by her husband’s love for another woman – This would have been true regardless of the circumstances surrounding her death.
But those circumstances – a fiery car accident in a Parisian tunnel just after midnight, her boyfriend, Dodi al Fayed, by her side – easily laid the foundation for countless conspiracy theories, including these 10.
Most, if not all, are based on the same general distrust of powerful people on which almost all conspiracy theories are generally based. But few have more power (and more inexplicably) than the royal family, whose position is derived from bloodlines, rather than from democracy, and which has been associated with a fair amount of mystery and scandal over the centuries. . Of all living members of the royal family, none are so inexplicably more powerful than Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh.
Prince Philip, Queen Elizabeth II’s husband, is not the king, and he would not even be a prince if it were not for the queen’s generosity to make him one after she took the throne in 1952. But still if the king The queen’s wife and the male counterpart of the royal family’s head, he has incredible power – even if that power is more theoretical than actually used.
The relationship between Princess Diana and her father-in-law
Prince Philip and Princess Diana had a complex relationship. Sometimes they were “warm and close”, but there are indications that they blamed him for encouraging his son, Prince Charles, to continue his affair with Camilla Parker Bowles. Diana allegedly felt ‘attacked’ by Philip when he tried to advise her on her marital problems, and allegedly he felt misunderstood and unappreciated by her. But regardless of the ups-and-downs of their relationship as in-laws, a power inequality would always persist: Prince Philip is the Queen’s husband and the father of the heir to the throne. His loyalty to his son, his wife and the monarchy would always outdo his love for his daughter-in-law.
And is that kind of imbalance between power and affection not the essence of all juicy murders? Think: Julius Caesar, killed by his friends and colleagues. Consider: the conspiracy of King Henry VIII against his wife, Anne Boleyn. In other words, the fact that Prince Philip and Princess Diana had a warm relationship does not in itself rule out that conspiracy theorists assume that Philip Diana wanted to get out of the way and did what he had to do to make that happen – and perhaps even fuel for conspiracy theorization .
It was Mohammad al Fayed, the father of Diana’s beloved, Dodi al Fayed, who put into words what many amateur conspiracy theorists might think: that Prince Philip ordered the death of Princess Diana because, with the Diana-Charles divorce completed, there was no another way to control the behavior of the mother of the future king, Prince William. In particular, Mr. Fayed believed that the royal family opposed Diana’s relationship with Dodi. He further believed that Diana was pregnant with Dodi’s child and that Diana and Dodi would have wanted to marry in the near future, and the royal family had no way to stop it, except by using their power and influence to help Diana kill him. orchestrating (with Dodi as additional damage).
That said, there has never been any piece of evidence to support Mr. Allegations. Fayed, and any official investigation into the death of Princess Diana has concluded that the accident was caused by the negligence of the driver of the car in which Diana was driving. But a lack of evidence does not tend to do much to suppress conspiracy theories. In fact, conspiracy theories seem to thrive on a lack of evidence, which in itself could possibly support the existence of a cover-up.
In this case there was no supervision of the crash, despite the fact that there were cameras in the tunnel in which the crash took place. Witnesses shared conflicting reports about what happened before and during the crash, including the existence of a white Fiat that might have been involved in the crash and a bright light that might have flashed just before the crash. In her emotionally disturbed final weeks, Diana had even expressed the fear that she would be killed, and no less in a car accident.
If you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail, the old adage goes, and when it comes to the processing of celebrity deaths, it is “human nature” to look for “reasons” that go beyond the “random, according to Pauline Maclaran, co-author of Royal Fever: The British Monarchy in Consumer Culture. “If you have icons, it’s very hard to believe that they can just end up in such a useless way.” And yet, sometimes that’s all: useless The idea that Princess Diana was murdered is just one of the twelve “facts” about her that is completely untrue.